You are popular with your colleagues, and having been head hunted you assume you are on pretty good terms with your own bosses as well.
Then, one day, you turn up, do your days’ work to the best of your ability, and finish up. You are then summoned in to the boss’ office, and are promptly informed you are sacked.
While you reel from this news, they then casually drop in the bombshell that a replacement has already been appointed. How is that going to make you feel?
Naturally, I haven’t disguised it too well but I am referring to Mark Hughes, and the outrageous (in my opinion at least) manner in which he has been treated by the board at Manchester City.
Mark Hughes is a legend in the city of Manchester, albeit with City’s major neighbours – but he still gave his heart and soul for the blue half as well since his appointment 18 months ago.
Agreed, the Citizens’ board needed to act swiftly and positively – as pointed out on Twitter by former pro Mark Bright. There can be no arguments they needed to do something, and quick.
But THAT quick? They more or less proved that the deal with Roberto Mancini was done behind Hughes’ back, and only didn’t sack him until they had thrashed out all the terms of the Italian’s deal.
This represents an outrageously devious side of the richest board in the country, and I am sorry to say I can only see this happening again if Mancini fails to perform.
Over at the Blue Moon forums, a poll has gone up to vote on the overall happiness of the board’s decision so far.
The fans, at the time of writing, are voting in favour of Mancini’s appointment. And why not!
The guy won 63% of his matches while in charge of Inter Milan, and won 3 Scudettos (including the club’s first in 18 years) during his time at the San Siro, as well as more silverware.
His record at Inter can’t be sniffed at, and many fans seem to believe this is a good appointment – one member offering the information above before simply ending with “take your pick…”
However, take into account his appalling less-than-23% winning record during his stint with Fiorentina, and 46% with Lazio. That gives him an average of around 44% overall. Compare THAT to Hughes’ 47% winning record at Man City? NOW take your pick.
Fair enough, the board have the club’s best interests at heart, and not Hughes’. In this day and age, contracts aren’t worth the paper they are printed on, and they can effectively get rid of who they want when they want from their club.
There is no denying that while they have done what countless other boards have done in replacing the present manager with one they see as a better candidate, ethically I don’t agree.
When Abu-Dhabi United Group Investment and Development Limited took over at the club last year, many fans at the time expressed concerns that this may be too big for a manager with Hughes’ limited experience.
Clearly, Hughes knew what was coming – his farewell to the fans following his side’s 4-3 home win over Sunderland was more than the average Saturday afternoon thank you. But that can’t have made it any easier, surely?
My question to you is, what was the point in Hughes even turning up to work yesterday? His side won, and he was always going to be sacked after the end of the match. Talk about fighting a losing battle!
So, what next for Hughes? Who would give a job to a manager who couldn’t even plug up a leaky defence with one of the biggest transfer kitties in the country?
The answer – any chairman with a grain of sense who wants to give their club a bit of heart, passion and intelligence.
Hughes will, in my opinion, one day be among the best managers in the country, alongside the likes of Martin O’Neill, Steve Bruce and potentially Gareth Southgate.
So, while I wish Mancini the best of luck in his new role, personally I will be waiting until the board decide to ditch him for another “more suitable” candidate.
Meanwhile, Hughes’ stock will rise, and eventually he’ll once again be a contender for one of the top jobs in football.
Then he’ll get the last laugh. And then anyone who agrees with me will be laughing by his side.












Recent Comments